WPC{o Wk$酭Mi$&k]Iixu]6@,HDpՄ&ɬd3Ug .2 ~uFsp&p( A&tκ ,V;}JW(^3@ җ2n0rv{ j:眳Et]ֵT; zNVUz}*xL 4Oi|}gR#>|u 2Фt+2rBJ%xŏȳ6C-gzzLW ,8g>-sr g`ͭ *L|$[-YfA˼?ȃe$6Ug0r`k{*1h+yY³*ߣ0n[ֈ[jdnߢǧ59{q,\"nxK0$jsZdr/޷o{5Xfl>/1=U.b % # _  a 0(m 0 t 0P B*aa BN2 0C 0UUUU.U. 0(LUtUUU.U. 0FU^UvUU.U. 0UUUU.U. 0M1 3~#U#U#U#U#U.#4$$ 0C8$U{$ 0$U-)UE)U])Uu)U)U)U)U)U)U* 0*U1,UI,Ua,Uy,U, 0W,U/U/U0/UH/U`/mx/m0^ R2!^2 02 034 1u5"5 0: 0cQ; 0y; 0-<E= 0= 0= 0Y> 0&? 0@ 0@ 0]A 0YB 0 +C 04D 0E 0F 0F 0G 0H 0yI 0bJ0x_K0K 0!L 0,M 08(O0`P0xJQ0Q0xR0S0xS 0DKT-T!\ L]!@R]!_!@"`!@bd!@f!@h!"k!k )Bl Xlwnn mnU:o 72Io<6X9`+CourierXHP LaserJet 5,,,,04Г($4F2PleadingX7XXdXXd7XG[:;   gS, d  X d X> W' xd>> W' xd>  8 1  8 2  8 3  8 4  8 5  8 6  8 7  8 8  8 9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28((3oQ$ !   d &0 d d d#|x$LIBRARY.STY(2E$ !  R\2RETENVWCRETURN ENVELOPE-'X `-@..  CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER @..XXX-'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-'X `-@..1801OAKLANDBLVD.,SUITE300@..$WALNUTCREEK,CA94596XXXC<  9`(CourierCXXXC<  9`(CourierC'X `'X `'X `<  9`(Courier<  9`(CourierJ\,ALENVALAMO ENVELOPE XXX-'X `-CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER -'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-'X `-1443DANVILLEBLVDALAMO,CA94507XXXC<  9`(CourierCXXXC<  9`(CourierC'X `'X `'X `<  9`(Courier<  9`(CourierX\,WCENVWALNUT CREEK ENVELOPEXXX-'X `- CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER -'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW- 'X `-1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300WALNUTCREEK,CA94596XXXC!<  9`(CourierCXXXC"<  9`(CourierC'X `'X `'X `<  9`(Courier<  9`(Courier^\2RETENVALRETURN ENVELOPE ALAMO-$'X `-@..  CLANCY,FIRPO,&WEISINGER @..XXX-%'X `-ATTORNEYSATLAW-&'X `-@..1443DANVILLEBLVD@..XALAMO,CA94507XXXC'<  9`(CourierCXXXC(<  9`(CourierC'X `'X `'X `<  9`(Courier<  9`(CourierlZP2WC/AL-LHWC/AL LETTERHEAD WITH FOOTERJG[:;XXf+pq @ CLANCY,FIRPO&WEISINGER   +XX+p,XXgX+X@"ATTORNEYSATLAW   ,@gX,X-@,@@"PATRICKE.CLANCY  @#PETERA.FIRPO@< MERRITTL.WEISINGER*-,x,-@.,x,],-,x@!*ALAWCORPORATIONJ  .XX],.,x/XfXgX.XKG[:;XXf+pqLIBRARY.STY'X `'X `'X `'X `<  9`(Courier-.-( -((2E$ !  'X ``F,WC2LHWALNUT CREEK LH(GALLIARD)-4'X `-@..jLAWOFFICESOF-5'X `-Ԉ-6'X `-@..<CLANCYANDFIRPO-7'X `-Ԉ-8'X `-1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300@..PATRICKE.CLANCY(#..1030GSTREETWALNUTCREEK,CA94596@..PETERA.FIRPO(#..SACRAMENTO,CA95814-9'X `-Ԉ-:'X `-TEL:(415)2566884(#..TEL:(916)4413605FAX:(415)2566861(#..{FAX:(916)4484730-;'X `-ԈXXX-<<6X`(-XXX-=<6X`(-'X `'X `'X `'X `'X `'X `'X `'X `<6X`(<6X`(p^F:SAC ENVELOPESACRAMENTO OFFICE ENVELOPE-?'X `-LAWOFFICESOF XXX-@'X `-CLANCY&FIRPO -A'X `-1030GSTREETSACRAMENTO,CA95814XXX-B<  `(-XXX-C<  `(-'X `'X `'X `<  `(<  `(NF.RETENVRETURN ENVELOPE-E'X `-@..LAWOFFICESOF@..XXX-F'X `- CLANCY&FIRPO-G'X `-@..u 1801OAKLANDBLVD.,SUITE300@..qWALNUTCREEK,CA.94596XXX-H<  `(-XXX-I<  `(-'X `'X `'X `<  `(<  `( c 1)  ,fXXf2i{f@1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300WALNUTCREEK,CA94596TEL:(510)2566884FAX:(510)2566861  @ 71443DANVILLEBLVD,ALAMO,CA94507TEL:(510)8380900FAX:(510)8380933, c 1)  ,fXXf2i{f@1801OAKLANDBLVD,SUITE300WALNUTCREEK,CA94596TEL:(510)2566884FAX:(510)2566861  @ 71443DANVILLEBLVD,ALAMO,CA94507TEL:(510)8380900FAX:(510)8380933,}. "@HOZqE?00004/Nmpϟ @2RQ@LL ~E\8Outln Doc 1Level 1 for Document Outline Style    @*  23  Ԁ        =}8Fig Lev 1.2Caption Style for 2 Level Figure Box Style FigureP1  .P1  Figure 1.2E]+BT Level 1U Level 2D2 Level 3;) * Level 4HB( Level 521p4+3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)?xxx,,XxfS[*PPP,,/Pf^'8,8,,^8iH,, EdNd,,dpT :TCT,,GXTi-@2@,,@@T F,!,,,,,x?xxx,,4XxjPTR&HHH,,khHf:Outln Doc 4-Levels 4-8 for Document Outline Style(;3$2#  0  .3  0  >;+:Pgph 2 Lev 12+e  0  .3    KV>:Outln Tech 6Level 6 for Technical Outline Style  2GF:Pgph 2 Lev 20  2+e  a  .3   ` J<:Outln Tech 8Level 8 for Technical Outline Style  2[:Pgph 2 Lev 30  0` (#(#2+e  i  .3   >p+:Pgph 2 Lev 40  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2+e(  0  )3    n :Outln RtPar3Level 3 for Right Paragraph Outline Style   ` @ 2+e  i  .3  Ԁ 0  J::Outln Tech 7Level 7 for Technical Outline Style  2:Pgph 2 Lev 50  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#2+e(  a  )3   h ~28Outln Doc 2Level 2 for Document Outline Style   23  0       ~> C8Outln Doc 3Level 3 for Document Outline Style    23  0 `   >G :Pgph 2 Lev 60  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#2+e(  i  )3    >i:Pgph 2 Lev 70  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#2+e  0  )3    >H:Pgph 2 Lev 80  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#2+e  a  )3   p jl !:Outln Tech ASupplements Outln Tech 1  i&1:Outln Tech 1Level 1 for Technical Outline Style    23  0          :Outln RtPar6Level 6 for Right Paragraph Outline Style   `     h $2+e(  i  )3  Ԁ h 0   :Outln RtPar7Level 7 for Right Paragraph Outline Style   `     h   *2+e  0  )3  Ԁ  0  ć:Outln RtPar8Level 8 for Right Paragraph Outline Style   `     h     /2+e  a  )3  Ԁ  0 p o2:Outln Tech 2Level 2 for Technical Outline Style   23  0       nl ):Outln Tech BSupplements Outln Tech 2  q/ %:Outln Tech 3Level 3 for Technical Outline Style   23  0    pl 1:Outln Tech CSupplements Outln Tech 3  s/ :Outln Tech 4Level 4 for Technical Outline Style 23  0    rl 9:Outln Tech DSupplements Outln Tech 4  (3$ !   #  oQ, d  X d X? W' xdE0,?? W' xdE&,?  , 88 1    , 88 2 8   , 88 3    , 88 4 H    , 88 5     , 88 6 X     , 88 7  0    , 88 8 h    , 88 9 @    , 10 x    , 11 P   , 12    , 13 `   , 14    , 15  p   , 16    , 17 0    , 18 "   , 19 @ $   , 20 !&   , 21 P#(   , 22 $( *   , 23 `&!,   , 24 '8#.   , 25 p)$0   , 26 *H&2   , 27 ,'4   , 28"@HOZqE?00004/Nmpϟ @2RQ@LL HO"u^(,DHHhl,,,Hh,,,,HHHHHHHHHH,,h0hdT\hTLdx44\XphPhXDXld\X\,,,DD,8H8H<(@L$$D$pLHHH000L@d@@@ p`6ITCGalliard RmnDeskTop2*0 p`6ITCGalliard RmnDeskTop+ 0 p`6ITCGalliard RmnDeskTop, 0 p`6ITCGalliard RmnDeskTop< 9+CourierBold<6X9`+CourierU<6X9`+"Courier 10cpiQi) !  _ FX8XXdd8Xu   X!XXX #X!XXX!#@N N SUPERIORCOURTOFCALIFORNIA,COUNTYOF L THEPEOPLEOFTHESTATEOF   D )  CaseNo.  CALIFORNIA,  <      D )   H   4    <      D )  MOTIONIN_LIMINE_:  \  4   Plaintiff,   D )  EXCLUDINGUSEOF    4    <      D )  SUBTERFUGEAROUND_BLEDSOE_     4 vs.   <      D )  ANDLIMITINGEVIDENCEOF X    4    <      D )  MYTHS&CHILDACCOMMODATION  l   4    <      D )  SYNDROME  0   4    <      D )      4   Defendant.   D )  Date: h   4    <      D )  Time: ,|  ___________________________________)  Dept: @   4 Thedefensemovesforaprotectiveorderthat: x   4 1.Theprosecutionnotbeallowedtointroducetheequivalent P ofaprofileofachildmolesterorvictimofamolestunderthe  subterfugeofdispellingnumerousmythsaboutchildmolestersor ` victimsofmolest.   4 2.Iftheprosecutionintendsonintroducingexperttestimony  p todispelallegedmyths,that:   4  a.Therebeahearingoutsidethepresenceofthejury 0  fortheprosecutiontospecifytheallegedmythandacontested " hearingastowhetherornotitisactuallyamyth. @ $  4  b.Thetestimonybenarrowlylimitedtoonlythoseitems !& % w foundbythecourttoactuallybemyths. P#(  4  c.Thatthetestimonytodispelamythbelimitedto $( * victimsasaclass. `&!, @rr. I '8#.   4 Thedefenseincorporateshereinbyreferencethefollowing p)$0 relatedin_limine_Ԁmotionsalsoonfile:Insertapplicablenames *H&2 suchasMotiontoExcludeExpertWitnessOpinionThatTheChildIs ,'4 AVictimofSexualMolest,MotiontoExcludeEvidenceofAnatomical .X)6 _Dolls,andMotiontoExcludeEvidenceofProfilesofChild  Molesters. 8 @66- II  @ USEOFEXPERTTESTIMONYTODISPELMYTHS  H   4  In Peoplevs.Bledsoe (1984)36Cal.3dd236,249,the   CaliforniaSupremeCourtheldthatrapetraumasyndromewas X   inadmissibletoshowarapehadactuallyoccurred,butcouldbe  0  admissibleto"disabus[e]thejuryofsomewidelyheld h  misconceptionsaboutrapeandrapetraumavictimssothatitmay @  evaluatetheevidencefreeoftheconstraintsofpopularmyths." T$  x  Subsequently,reviewingcourtshaveheldvalidtheuseofexpert P testimonytodispelmythsaboutchildmolestvictims.However,the  testimonyislimitedtovictimsasaclassandnotaparticular ` allegedvictim. Peoplevs.Roscoe (1985)168Cal.App.3d1093,  10981100; Peoplevs.Gray (1986)187Cal.App.3d213,218; People  p vs.Coleman (1989)48Cal.3d112,144; and Peoplevs.Stark (1989)  213Cal.App.3d107,116117.Inaddition,testimonynotproperly 0  limitedisexcludablepursuanttoEvidenceCodesection352. " ( Roscoe ,supra,atp.1100.) @ $ @- III !& @ LIMITSONEVIDENCETODISPELMYTHS  P#(  4 In Peoplevs.Bowker (1988)203Cal.App.3d385,394,249Cal. $( * Rptr.886,891,thecourtconsideredwhetherornotthetestimony `&!, ofachildabuseaccommodationsyndromeexpertfellwithinthe '8#.  Bledsoe exceptionpermittingsuchtestimonyforthenarrowpurpose p)$0 "ofdisabusingthejuryofmisconceptionsastohowchildvictims *H&2 reacttoabuse."(Id.,atp.392.)Thecourtreaffirmedthat ,'4 " Bledsoe mustbereadtorejecttheuseofCSAASevidenceasa .X)6 predictorofchildabuse,"andfoundtheexpert'stestimonyhad  exceededthe Bledsoe exceptionholding that"ataminimumthe 8 evidencemustbetargetedtoaspecific'myth'or'misconception'  suggestedbytheevidence."(Id.,atpp.393394.)Thecourt H  furtherheld:   8 4 "Inthetypicalcriminalcase,however,itisthe X   People'sburdentoidentifythemythormisconceptionthe  l  evidenceisdesignedtorebut.Wherethereisnodanger  0  ofjuryconfusion,thereissimplynoneedfortheexpert   testimony."(Id.,atp.394.) h 4(#4(#   4   4 Indeterminingthattheexpert'stestimonyerroneously   exceededthepermissiblelimitsofthe Bledsoe exception,the <  Bowker court foundthattheexpert'stestimonywastailoredtofit  thechildreninthatparticularcase,askedforsympathy,asked L thatchildrenbebelievedandbydescribingeachaspectofCSAAS $ theoryprovidedascientificframeworkthejurycoulduseto \ predictamolestoccurred.Thecourtruledthatthisevidence 4 shouldhavebeenexcluded.(Id.,atpp.394395.) l @66- IV D! @&JURYINSTRUCTION  |#  4 Whentestimonyisintroducedtodispelamyththejurymustbe !T% instructednottousethatevidencetopredictamolesthasbeen "' committed. $d) 8 4 "Beyondthetailoringoftheevidenceitself,thejury % + mustbeinstructedsimplyanddirectlythattheexpert's `&!, testimonyisnotintendedandshouldnotbeusedto $'t"- determinewhetherthevictim'smolestationclaimsis '8#. true.ThejurorsmustunderstandthatCSAASresearch (#/ approachestheissuefromaperspectiveoppositetothat p)$0 ofthejury.CSAASassumesamolestationhasoccurred 4*%1 andseekstodescribeandexplaincommonreactionsof *H&2 childrentotheexperience.(SeeInreSaraM.,supra, + '3 194Cal.App.3datp.593,239Cal.Rptr.605.)The ,'4 evidenceisadmissiblesolelyforthepurposeofshowing D-(5 thatthevictim'sreactionsasdemonstratedbythe .X)6 evidencearenotinconsistentwithhavingbeenmolested." .*7 ( Bowker ,supra,atp.394; Peoplevs.Housley (1992)6  Cal.App.4th947,958959[suchinstructionrequiredsua t sponte.)84(#4(# @VV) CONCLUSION    4 Insum,theprosecutioncannotcircumventthelimitsplacedon  \ experttestimonyinchildmolestcasesbyclaimingeachelementof    aprofileofachildmolesterorchildmolestvictimisamythand  l  underthissubterfugeintroduceexpertopinionthatthejurycould   usetopredictthatamolesthadoccurred. ,|   4 Dated:    4    <     Respectfullysubmitted, <  4    <     ____________________________ L  4    <      4    <     AttorneyforDefendant